While gambling in South Carolina is illegal – sort of – the reality is that betting on sports isn’t difficult in the Palmetto State.
Some states recently demanded online betting sites shut down in their state, saying companies are making bogus claims that their contests are not gambling.
The question now becomes whether South Carolina could follow suit.
The state is one of several with laws expressly prohibiting gambling on sports teams. What’s legal nationwide because of federal law are wagers called fantasy sports, which involve groups of people assembling imaginary teams of real players, then seeing how those “teams” perform in real life. Bettors are wagering on multiple players’ individual performances, not games.
But some sites now offer what’s called “daily fantasy sports.” Bettors still wager on players’ statistics – but over a short time, usually a day. And bettors often compete not against other bettors but against the sportsbook, or “the house,” meaning they’re betting against faceless gaming experts or computer algorithms.
Those two things – the short-term nature of the bets and competing against the house – have begun to blur the line between “fantasy” betting and the sports gambling that’s illegal. They reflect Las Vegas more than that game against your brothers and cousins.
“These games, logistically and mechanically, are exactly the same as sportsbooks,” said Dustin Gouker, a sports betting and online gambling consultant and analyst at Closing Line Consulting in Oregon.
But now, the ground has begun to shift around South Carolina.
Florida is one of several states to send cease-and-desist letters in recent weeks to sites that offer daily fantasy, telling them they were in violation of gambling laws.
Robert Kittle, a spokesperson for the S.C. attorney general, declined an interview request.
But he said, “Our office is not taking action on online gambling.”
Meanwhile, South Carolinians have a new, full-on sports gambling option: North Carolina on March 11 legalized all sports gambling.
“South Carolina citizens are going to go to North Carolina to engage in a more open sport gambling marketplace,” said Mark Nagel, a USC sports and entertainment professor and researcher. “And that’s going to cause many people in South Carolina or more people to say, ‘Why can’t I do this here?’”
The state of gambling now
Two major gambling bills were proposed during the current South Carolina General Assembly session. One would allow online horse betting. The other would allow bets on both sports and horse races.
Both bills face opposition from the state’s conservative leadership, including the House majority leader.
“I just don’t think we need to supply that temptation in the state of South Carolina,” said Rep. David Hiott, R-Pickens, South Carolina’s House majority leader, who opposes both bills.
A 2018 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the federal ban on gambling in most states was unconstitutional, saying it was up to each state to decide.
South Carolina has not followed the dozens of states that have legalized sports gambling.
“If they want to use (their) money to wager on a horse race every now and then, then they should have the right to do that,” said Rep. Russell Ott, D-St. Matthews, a sponsor of South Carolina’s two gambling bills.
“Especially in light of the fact that we’ve got state-sanctioned gambling already in the state, with the state lottery,” Ott added.
The proceeds from residents playing in two national lotteries help pay for public schools and college tuition, a key reason why lawmakers made the lotteries legal in 2002.
The Wild West of sports betting: daily fantasy
The online sports gambling boom is here.
Many states, even some of South Carolina’s southern neighbors, have put aside long-held moral objections in exchange for an influx of tax revenue.
“We’re in kind of this weird situation now where many, many more states now have some form of state gambling that’s allowed, many of them revolving around sports,” Nagel said. “But there are still quite a few states … that have been very reticent to engage in legalizing gambling opportunities.”
Still, daily fantasy contests continue to happen right under the nose of legislators in South Carolina and 16 other states.
Daily fantasy games, often called “pick’ems,” allow bettors to place real money on player statistics. Unlike traditional fantasy sports, the contest does not take place over the length of an entire season and the bettor has the option of betting against the house rather than other participants.
Player statistics, often called player props, include betting on things such as points scored or yards gained. When multiple bets are placed at once, called a parlay, the bettor can choose how much to wager, winning if all the bets come through. The sportsbook, or the “house,” sets the odds and the payout for each bet made.
Bettors can wager on just about anything and any combination of sports and statistics – from a hockey player’s “time on ice” to total games played in a tennis match.
Daily fantasy exists because of legal exemptions for the traditional fantasy contests that began to gain popularity in the 1980s and ’90s. The federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, which barred full-on sports gambling in all states except Nevada, said fantasy sports was allowed.
Fantasy sports often took place over the course of a full season and for small stakes, USC’s Nagel said.
In the period following fantasy sport’s exemption from gambling prohibition, fantasy sports services began offering daily fantasy contests that closely mirrored gambling that was expressly illegal.
“They used the fact that fantasy sports was exempt from PASPA (Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act) laws, and also marketed daily fantasy as a game of skill rather than a game of chance,” Nagel said. “That kind of worked with the general public that, ‘Oh, daily fantasy is not something that should be touched by the anti-gambling laws.’”
The idea behind the legality of daily fantasy is that parlays of multiple players from multiple teams are a game of skill, not chance, according to daily fantasy operators. That legal notion has yet to be challenged in South Carolina.
“It’s not explicitly legal,” Gouker said. “It’s not explicitly illegal, either.”
Unnoticed, unregulated and untaxed
That distinction between gambling and games of skill allows for unregulated sports betting in states such as South Carolina.
But because the state has not addressed it, it’s unable to tax or regulate those contests.
“There’s no barrier to entry. There’s no taxes, no regulations,” Gouker said.
In South Carolina, a user can sign up and begin placing bets within minutes of providing personal information, such as a name, address, birthdate and the last four digits of a person’s Social Security number in some cases.
The apps do use location services on user devices. In states that have cracked down on daily fantasy, users are blocked from placing wagers.
Ott said he does not see much of a difference between daily fantasy and gambling, and believes it should be regulated and taxed by the state.
“I think that those types of companies that are offering those services here need to contribute to the well-being of our state,” Ott said.
Hiott disagrees.
“I don’t approve of anything related to gambling,” he said when asked about daily fantasy regulation.
In states with legislation on daily fantasy, taxes often go toward programs to assist with gambling addiction. South Carolina’s inaction has been blamed on lawmakers’ failure to see both its rise in popularity and its tax potential.
“I don’t know that gambling, and sports gambling and daily fantasy have been that important in the eyes of many South Carolina legislators,” Nagel said.
No dice on gambling, again
Since the beginning of the South Carolina Education Lottery in 2002, victories for proponents of gambling have been few and far between.
A bi-partisan proposal to legalize horse betting in April 2023 was the most successful in years, narrowly passing the House, 55 to 46.
The proposed Equine Advancement bill was motivated less by a desire to legalize gambling and more to provide a lifeline to South Carolina’s fading equine industry, according to Ott.
In crafting the bill, as they did with the lottery and its funding for education, the state’s social conservatives were able to bend their rigid opposition to gambling for economic growth.
The House victory appeared to be a shift in the viability of gambling in the state, which has long been politically unfeasible. But the bill came to a screeching halt days later, when Gov. Henry McMaster released a statement saying he would veto the bill upon its arrival in his office.
But there’s another bill, the Sports and Equine Wagering bill, that would allow betting on both horse races and sports. Some of the revenue raised would go to the equine industry and to fund mental health resources for gambling addiction.
The once-promising bill has been stalled in the House’s Ways and Means Committee since January 2023.
This story was filed as part of an editorial partnership between South Carolina Public Radio and the University of South Carolina’s Carolina News and Reporter. You can learn more about the Carolina News and Reporter here.
