It's Thursday, Feb. 12.
Week 5 of the 2026 legislative session has almost wrapped.
The House returns at 10 a.m.
The Senate gavels in at 11 a.m., when the chamber will get back to debate over S. 768, Senate Finance Chairman Harvey Peeler's property tax reduction bill. The legislation sponsored by the Cherokee Republican would expand the state's homestead exemption law to $150,000 for anyone age 65 and up, with limits on new residents.
You're reading The State House Gavel, your daily reporter notebook by Maayan Schechter and Gavin Jackson that previews and captures what goes on at the South Carolina Statehouse.
A couple of news items before we "gavel in" this Thursday.
First, Gov. Henry McMaster has finally made his endorsement clear for who he wants to be South Carolina's next governor.
In an interview with Associated Press reporter Meg Kinnard, McMaster's Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette shared a video message from the state's top executive, saying, "With Pamela Evette as our next governor, we'll keep winning."
The pair — McMaster chose the Travelers Rest businesswoman as his running mate before his first term in 2018 — are scheduled to appear together at an event in Columbia today.
Second, though the topic was not up for debate inside the Statehouse, local to state leaders Wednesday reacted to news reports that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had entered a lease in a prominent down Columbia building.
Statement from Senator Tameika Isaac Devine @TIDEVINE pic.twitter.com/KT9GUfXh55
— South Carolina Senate Democrats (@SCSenateDems) February 11, 2026
Local leaders, including the mayor, said they were unaware.
“In South Carolina, state and federal law enforcement agencies coordinate, communicate, and collaborate with one another on a daily basis on serious matters of public safety and national security," Gov. McMaster's office said Wednesday. "There is no expectation that federal law enforcement agencies notify the Governor’s Office in advance of making routine day-to-day administrative decisions.”
Notebook highlights:
- House passes bill to give governor more appointment power in judge selection process
- University and college athletic directors push for limited disclosure of NIL and revenue-sharing contracts with athletes
Should gov pick judge screening panel? House says yes
The House on Wednesday passed legislation that would give the governor full appointment power over who sits on the judicial screening panel.
The 86-25 vote on H. 4755, filed by Rep. Gil Gatch, R-Dorchester, fell mainly on political party lines, pushing the bill over to the Senate.
Honored to have gotten judicial reform passed in the House! A special thanks to all of you who made this possible. pic.twitter.com/OxM9GtpCBM
— Gil Gatch (@GilGatch) February 11, 2026
The proposal removes legislators from the 10-member Judicial Merit Selection Commission, or JMSC, which screens and approves candidates for a handful of judicial seats, from family and circuit courts all the way to the state Supreme Court.
Instead, the JMSC would expand to 12 seats and the governor would choose all the members.
None can be a legislator, and the spouse or family member of a sitting lawmaker would also be ineligible.
The legislation requires term limits, and also notes that factors like race, gender, religion or any other "diversity, equity, and inclusion criteria" cannot be used in the process of nominations and appointments.
And, under a change made Wednesday, the bill would require the Senate (which chooses magistrate judges) to send magistrate candidates to the JMSC for a review of their qualifications. The JMSC would then send their report to the governor and Senate, the governor would make the appointment and the Senate would decide whether to confirm.
Why the push?
As you'll recall, a newly passed law changing the makeup of the JMSC — giving the governor some appointment power — only took effect last year.
But, since, there's been a push — by the conservative hardline House Freedom Caucus, Attorney General Alan Wilson, the governor, and other outside groups — to strip lawyer-legislators entirely from the screening panel.
Removing the Legislature altogether from the judicial election process, as some have called for, requires a much heavier lift: changing the state constitution.
The legislation now goes over to the Senate, where the bill does have support. Though it still remains a question as to whether the chamber takes a real bite at the bill before the year ends.
Other House notes:
- In a unanimous 103-0 vote, the House passed H. 5006, sponsored by Rep. Brandon Newton, R-Lancaster, which would offer small businesses a tax break, exempting the first $10,000 from business personal property taxes and offers a tax break to certain companies if their headquarters are located in South Carolina.
- A House Ways and Means subcommittee heard more testimony over the chamber's state Department of Transportation modernization bill, H. 5071, sponsored by Education and Public Works Chair Shannon Erickson, R-Beaufort. The House version is slightly different than S. 831, sponsored by Senate Transportation Chair Larry Grooms, R-Berkeley, which sits on a parallel track in the upper chamber and will be heard by a subcommittee this morning. The House bill includes changes to:
- Restructure the agency and make it a part of the governor's Cabinet
- Remove two at-large members of the DOT Commission
- Update tolling statutes, increase biennial registration fees on electric vehicles, and add a fee of 4.5 cents per kilowatt-hour on electricity at publicly accessible charging stations
- Provide greater oversight of county transportation committees and strengthen internal audits
- Incentivize local governments to take ownership and maintenance responsibilities of state-owned roads
Senate panel OKs NIL bill as some voice concerns
South Carolina could very soon join other states that limit the public disclosure of name, image and likeness and revenue-sharing contracts between colleges and universities and college athletes — an expansion of state law that universities say without could put them at a real competitive disadvantage.
Athletic directors from the state's major universities and colleges have asked South Carolina lawmakers to pass H. 4902, saying it strikes a balanced approach by protecting individual student-athletes, while allowing the public to know the aggregate total spending per year.
"For programs like Coastal that compete nationally, disclosure of individual agreements would create immediate and material competitive harm," Chance Miller, vice president for Intercollegiate Athletics and University Recreation at Coastal Carolina University, wrote to Senate Education Chairman Greg Hembree, R-Horry. "If South Carolina public institutions are required to disclose individualized terms while peer competitors in other states are not, our student-athletes and our programs would be put at a clear disadvantage in recruiting, retention, and roster management."
"This approach preserves appropriate public accountability without exposing sensitive, individualized financial information," University of South Carolina's Athletic Director Jeremiah Donati wrote to Hembree.
"Subjecting these agreements to public disclosure would raise serious privacy concerns for our student-athletes, potentially exposing them to undue public scrutiny and creating risks that extend well beyond the playing field," Clemson University's Athletics Director Graham Neff wrote Hembree.
The Senate Education Committee advanced the legislation, sponsored by House Majority Leader Davey Hiott, R-Pickens, Wednesday by voice vote to keep those contracts private.
The vote was not unanimous.
Sen. Everett Stubbs, a York County Republican, voted to send the bill to the Senate floor but said he had serious hesitation.
You can listen to Stubb's remarks at the hearing below:
The bipartisan-backed bill has hit the fast-track in the General Assembly, bypassing traditional hearings for public testimony.
The House, which passed the bill, completely skipped the committee process, putting it on the floor without much notice.
The Senate Education Committee held a full committee hearing over the bill but skipped the subcommittee stage — an issue raised by Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson.
Instead, the committee took written testimony, which it received from college and university athletic directors as reported above and Jay Bender, an attorney for the South Carolina Press Association.
"This legislation will not 'save college sports.' It will not make Carolina a national champion in football," Bender wrote. "It only serves the interests of the schools at the expense of the public, the players, and the credibility of the General Assembly."
The bill could be taken up by the Senate and sent as early as this month to the desk of McMaster, who has shared his own concerns about contract transparency as we reported this week.
Read more:
- Post and Courier: SC bill to keep athlete NIL pay secret passes committee but resistance potentially remains
- SC Daily Gazette: Bill shielding SC college NIL agreements from public records law advances in the Senate
- WIS: SC lawmakers fast-track bill to keep NIL contracts private
Statehouse daily planner (2/12)
SC House
- 9 a.m. — Blatt 409 — Agriculture Subcommittee of the House Agriculture Committee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 9 a.m. — Blatt 427 — Regulations, Admin. Procedures, Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — House in session
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - After House adjourns — Blatt 521 — Ways and Means proviso subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - After House adjourns — Blatt 110 — Government Efficiency and Legislative Oversight Healthcare and Regulatory Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only
SC Senate
- 9 a.m. — Gressette 408 — LCI Special Subcommittee
Agenda - 9 a.m. — Gressette 308 — Senate Transportation Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 9 a.m. — Gressette 105 — Senate Medical Affairs Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 9 a.m. — Gressette 207 — Senate Judiciary Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — Gressette 407 — Finance Higher Education Subcommittee
Agenda - 10 a.m. — Gressette 209 — Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee on 3924
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 11 a.m. — Senate in session
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - After Senate adjourns — Gressette 209 — Property Tax Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - After Senate adjourns — Third floor Statehouse conference room — Finance Natural Resources and Economic Development Subcommittee
Agenda
Statehouse clips from around the state
- SC school board chair is opening a charter school in his district. Can he do it? (The State)
- ‘A kick in the pants’: SC bill banning minimum grades in schools advances in House (SC Daily Gazette)
- SC House advances bill on how judges are picked, giving more power to governor’s office (Post and Courier)
- Bill would allow local governments in South Carolina to pause developments if infrastructure can't handle it (WLTX)
- Are ‘games of skill’ legal in SC? State looks to clarify gambling rules (The State)
- Protests planned, businesses wary after news of ICE office in Columbia. What are leaders saying? (Post and Courier)
- Alcohol training law aims to ease insurance costs for South Carolina bars (WSPA)
- Charleston-area lawmaker introduces new language to bill cracking down on 'whip-its' (WCIV)
- Lawmakers eye measures to regulate growth as SC population booms (Post and Courier)
- SC bill to boost veterans bingo raises concerns among nonprofits (Fox Carolina)