It's Wednesday, April 29.
The House gavels in at 10 a.m.
The lower chamber, as we reported Tuesday, will plow through likely dozens of amendments on the Senate-approved Department of Transportation modernization bill — S. 831 — which a House committee amended with the language of its proposal, H. 5071.
The Senate returns at 1 p.m.
Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey, R-Edgefield, told colleagues the intention is to work through House legislation.
You're reading The State House Gavel, your daily reporter notebook by Maayan Schechter and Gavin Jackson that previews and captures what goes on at the South Carolina Statehouse.
Notebook highlights:
- Senate votes to raise legislative pay with timing change
- After months of negotiations, State Election Commission votes to engage with Department of Justice over voter data
- Sine death? The risks without a sine die agreement
- Protest erupts over Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette's planned commencement speech at S.C. State University. How she responded and what others are saying back
Why a GOP senator is pushing for legislative pay raise
The South Carolina Senate on Tuesday voted 24-18 to pass legislation that would raise raise legislative pay starting with the 128th General Assembly, when both the House and Senate are brand new.
The bill — S. 933, sponsored by Sen. Shane Martin, R-Spartanburg — would effectively raise all 170 members' base pay to $47,500, adjusting for inflation but not to exceed 5%.
"It's been in my heart to do what's right for the General Assembly," Martin told SC Public Radio Tuesday. "Nobody ever takes care of the General Assembly, and you get to where you get expenses reimbursed, but you end up spending twice what you're getting reimbursed."
"I want to leave this place better than I found it," Martin added.
Legislative pay varies from state to state but South Carolina lawmakers — the legislature is a part-time legislature, though lawmakers meet throughout the year, in addition to responding to constituent needs — are on the lower end of the pay scale.
Lawmakers receive a base pay of $10,400, plus $1,000 per month for in-district expenses, and other mileage and per diem.
Neither the base nor in-district pay have risen since the 90s.
Under Martin's bill, lawmakers' base pay would rise to $15,000.
And in-district pay would go from $12,000 a year to $32,500.
A fiscal impact by the state Revenue and Fiscal Affair's Office shows a cost of nearly $4.3 million, broken down by about $3 million for the 124-member House and $1.1 million for the 46-member Senate.
Martin has continually advocated for higher legislative pay, repeating often that the legislature should not be only for the "rich, the retired and the retained."
"Probably after my first term, I told my wife, I said, 'I'm not taking the postcard vote.' If I believe it and it's the right thing to do, I'm not going to hide behind the fact that somebody might not like it and I might get dinged on the postcard. The postcard's coming anyway," Martin said. "So, what I found is you tell the truth always, and you don't have to remember, well, did I vote for that just because it looked good or did I vote against it and really want it to pass? I feel like this is the best thing for the General Assembly to take care of this legislative compensation, so that members get their expenses covered, they're not going in the hole, but you're not getting rich."
Martin tried last year to raise in-district pay to $2,500 through a budget measure. It was eventually tossed out by the state Supreme Court, which ruled the legislature could not increase its own pay, rather the pay of a future General Assembly.
Martin and colleagues have tried a similar move this year in the budget, with slight tweaks, explained by lawmakers as a placeholder in case his standalone bill doesn't move forward.
Martin added of his bill, "I've told people before, my next opponent can at least afford to run."
State elections agency to share voter data with DOJ
After months of negotiations, the State Election Commission voted 4-1 on Tuesday to enter into an agreement with the Department of Justice to release South Carolina voters' data with the federal government.
The DOJ's demands date back to last year, a request that was part of a multi-state ask for the Justice Department to review potential cases of ineligible or non-citizens on states' voter rolls.
The memorandum between the State Election Commission and the DOJ states that the state will turn over the data, then return the information to the State Election Commission for review.
That data of the state's roughly 3.3 million voters will include names, birth dates, home addresses, driver's license numbers and the last four digits of voters' Social Security numbers.
"It is a top priority of the SC State Election Commission to protect the private information of our voters, specifically Social Security numbers," the SEC said in a statement after the vote.
The agreement, the SEC says, will require a highly secure encryption process to protect voters' information called "hashing." That process, according to the SEC, protects sensitive voter data by using a unique digital fingerprint that can show the information without revealing its original content.
"In contrast, encryption is a reversible process used to protect data so it can be unlocked later with the right key. In this way, the SEC continues to put protecting voter’s information high on our priority list," the State Election Commission said.
South Carolina's elections agency, now run by Director Conway Belangia, plans to send the data, which can only be viewed by the DOJ, in the next several days
Read more:
- SC Daily Gazette: SC can send voter rolls to the federal government, Election Commission says
- The State: SC to send voters’ private data to federal government. How will it be used?
- WIS: South Carolina Election Commission agrees to share voter data with Department of Justice
No sine die, no problem?
With eight days left on the South Carolina legislative calendar, the full General Assembly has yet to pass a resolution that would outline what lawmakers can return post-sine die to do.
And with the 5 o'clock May 14 deadline on the horizon, it's unclear based on conversations with various lawmakers whether the legislature can or will get it done, or whether they believe the legislature needs one.
Background: The Senate passed a sine die resolution earlier this year, a rather uneventful procedural matter that typically happens every year so the legislature can give itself a cushion to handle the budget, any conference committees and vetoes from the governor once the legislature's official calendar ends.
Without one, the legislature is at the whim of the governor, who can call (or refuse to call) the General Assembly back into session for any matter at any time.
Look ahead: Legislators tell us the risk is that a resolution can get bogged down with individual lawmakers' or a group's particular priorities. But the risk without it? They say conference committees could pile up in the last days of the session, complicating the calendar with a time-restricted deadline. There is separate legislation specific to the budget beyond May 14. That bill has not moved through the full General Assembly.
Lt. Gov. Evette responds to SC State student protest
Students at South Carolina State University, the state's only public four-year historically Black university, protested on Tuesday against the planned graduation speech from Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, who is running for the Republican nomination for governor.
An online petition against her invitation, which the university has not formally announced for May 8, grew to more than 5,300 signatures by Wednesday morning.
"Throughout our history, we have been at the forefront of advocating for social justice, equality, and education that truly represents and supports our community," the petition states. "Inviting a speaker whose actions and policies do not resonate with the ethos of our university undermines this legacy."
SC State University students peacefully protesting in the campus administration building Tuesday against having Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette as the May 2026 Commencement speaker. The university has not officially announced a speaker. @wachfox pic.twitter.com/IGM3GcjJQQ
— Keiyona Jordon (@JordonKeiyonaWF) April 28, 2026
Evette's response?
Through her campaign and social media channels, Evette referred to the student protestors as "woke mobs" she said who are "coming after me for being a champion of eliminating radical DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) scams on college campuses."
"So bring it on. Just like President Trump, I’ll never back down or bend a knee to the woke radicals," she said. "I’m ending DEI on campuses once and for all."
Let’s be clear: facts trump feelings in the real world. President @realDonaldTrump and conservatives have done more for HBCUs than any administration in history.
— Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette (@PamelaEvette) April 28, 2026
Here is my response to the protests today at S.C. State University. pic.twitter.com/HYF4XjzZd0
Evette's response has received backlash on its own.
In return, Democratic lawmakers in both chambers criticized the lieutenant governor's response, arguing her words were partisan and disrespectful toward the students and school.
"You know what to do," state Rep. Hamilton Grant, a Richland Democrat who graduated from S.C. State, told students via social media.
"The students deserve a ceremony centered on them, their future, and their success," said Sen. Deon Tedder, a Charleston Democrat who also graduated from S.C. State. "Further, a potential commencement speaker should not insult or attack the students they wish to address further."
Evette said she planned to "have a lot more to say" later, later doubling down in a response on X that in part said, "Well, they are going to really hate my speech because it does the thing they hate the most - telling the truth.
Statehouse daily planner (4/29)
SC House
- 9 a.m. — Blatt 516 — Judiciary Criminal Laws Subcommittee on 235, 399, 428
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — House in session
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only
SC Senate
- 9 a.m. — Gressette 207 — Labor, Commerce and Industry Special Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — Gressette 307 — Legislative Oversight Subcommittee on Confederate Relic Room and Military Museum
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — Gressette 105 — Senate Education Committee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — Gressette 209 — Senate Medical Affairs Subcommittee
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 10 a.m. — Gressette 407 — Fish, Game and Forestry Subcommittee on 4478
Agenda - 11 a.m. — Gressette 307 — Legislative Oversight Subcommittee on Commission for Community Advancement and Engagement
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 11 a.m. — Gressette 207 — Banking and Insurance Committee for Catalis Deferred Presentment Report and on 920, 4817
Agenda - Noon — Gressette 308 — Family and Veterans' Services Committee — Appointments and on 3510
Agenda
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only - 1 p.m. — Senate in session
Live Broadcast
Live Broadcast - Audio Only
SC governor
- 12:30 p.m. — Gov. Henry McMaster to meet with South Carolina STEM students on signing day at the Statehouse
Statehouse clips from around the state
- Yearslong effort to bring SC’s consumer watchdog under governor nears vote. Some are nervous. (Post and Courier)
- Did SC really give data centers $800M in sales tax breaks last year? (The State)
- Effort to study hate crime law fails in South Carolina Senate (WIS)
- Rock Hill courting ‘Palmetto Rock’ for failed Panthers practice site (SC Daily Gazette)
- Bill regulating data centers advances in South Carolina (WLTX)
- SC is on the verge of passing a charter school reform bill. Which one will it be? (The State)
- SC Gov. Henry McMaster, Lt. Gov. Evette at White House for Trump greeting of British Royals (Post and Courier)
- Trio battle for ‘non-traditional’ lane in SC gov’s race. Will 1 make GOP runoff? (The State)